Belief x Time x Effort = Life
In most lives, there is a lack of time, connection, and security to build ideas at the table for most people. Whether this is a state of the individual’s choice is left to be determined by the subjective experience of the person or this could be said to be a by-product of a system.
Our intention here is to correlate and digest the effective manners in which they can interact. Furthermore, we are choosing to dedicate our time to the field of human “value reciprocation” or sharing is that we feel that there is a way to add jet fuel to the access to the opportunity of anyone. Lastly, this is an attempt to lovingly trap selfishness into progress. The outcome will be an understanding that no matter the choice of the individual or the effects of the system anyone will be able to change their access to opportunity in life.
There is always a state of value reciprocation between an individual and more appropriately themselves. From this identification of self, there can become identification with other people in which value reciprocation is desired. From there, individuals that intend to exchange value follow the path of establishing expectations until something like the path of least resistance is found between each other, then exchange happens. This has organically occurred between groups over the millennia. To parallel the idea of exchange and how that happens, there are many granular components to these exchanges regarding how they govern themselves and the balance between the need for paternalism and the need for authority. From there are a series of very deep questions that can be asked such as.
- How much paternalism is necessary?
- Can people self-organize value reciprocation? If so, why, how, and what do they need?
- What is needed for the dynamic ever-changing equilibrium of value & expectations?
- Is it all expectations for the goal of security?
- Why do people not execute ideas/improvements?
To approach this we feel as though a framework of consideration or context is needed. From there we can then digest some of the questions we have posed and those that come from them through a replicable process. The following article or series is a place for us to digest these questions so please ask as many as you can think of as well. From there we’ll organize the pieces into vital, secondary, and tertiary components. Actually, the mention of the ordering of these brings into mind the need for a state of finality and that is not, as a reminder, to be our intent. The final bridging of these, in their “accepted state” (good enough/limbic consensus), will be what we close on.
